Book your Free Estate Planning Consultation Today
Book an Initial Call NowWhen families make an estate plan, they usually focus on who will inherit their property and how much each person will get. But it is just as important to think about what happens to that inheritance once the beneficiary receives it. A child could face a lawsuit, business debt, or other financial problems in the future that were not an issue when the plan was made.
If the inheritance goes directly to the child, those assets might lose protections that a well-structured trust could provide. That is why we encourage families to look beyond simply passing on assets and consider how to protect them for their loved ones.
Under New York law, trusts can provide meaningful creditor protection in appropriate circumstances, but not every trust provides the same protection. The identity of the person creating the trust, the rights given to the beneficiary, the trustee’s authority, and the way distributions are structured all matter. For Suffolk County residents who also spend substantial time in Florida, differences between the two states’ trust laws make careful planning particularly important.
Suppose parents leave their adult child $750,000 outright under a will. Once the estate is administered and the money is distributed to the child personally, that inheritance generally becomes the child’s property. If the child later has an enforceable judgment entered against him or her, those inherited assets may potentially become part of the financial resources creditors pursue.
A different approach may be to leave the inheritance in a continuing trust for the child rather than requiring an immediate distribution. The trustee can hold, invest, and distribute assets according to carefully written terms. Depending on the trust structure, the beneficiary may receive money for appropriate needs without having unrestricted ownership of the entire inheritance.
New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 5205(c) provides significant protection for certain property held in trust for a judgment debtor when that trust was created or funded by someone other than the judgment debtor. New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 7-1.5 also addresses restrictions on transferring certain beneficial interests in trusts.
Because of these rules, a trust set up by a parent for a child can protect assets from creditors in ways that giving the inheritance directly cannot.
Simply placing the word “trust” on an estate planning document does not guarantee asset protection. The terms of the trust matter greatly.
If a trust says the trustee must give all the assets to the beneficiary at a certain age, the protection can end once the money is handed over. For example, if half the inheritance is given at age 30 and the rest at 35, those funds become the beneficiary’s personal property once received.
For some families, it may be better to keep assets in a trust for a longer time. An independent or carefully chosen trustee can decide when to make distributions, so the beneficiary still benefits from the inheritance. The goal is not to keep the beneficiary from enjoying the assets, but to separate access from full ownership to offer more protection.
This can be especially valuable when significant family wealth, investment property, business interests, or other appreciating assets are involved.
One of the most important distinctions under New York law involves whose creditors we are trying to address.
New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 7-3.1 provides that a disposition in trust for the use of the trust’s creator is generally void against the creator’s existing or subsequent creditors. In practical terms, New York generally does not allow someone to place assets into a trust for his or her own benefit and then simply declare those assets unavailable to creditors.
That is very different from a parent establishing a properly structured trust for a child or grandchild. New York CPLR § 5205(c) specifically addresses trusts created by someone other than the judgment debtor, which is why third-party inheritance planning can offer protection that ordinary self-settled planning may not.
This distinction is critical. Asset protection planning should be completed thoughtfully and prospectively. A trust should not be treated as a device for moving assets out of creditors’ reach after serious financial claims already exist.
We often find that families initially ask about creditor protection because they are worried about lawsuits or business risks, but the same trust structure may address several concerns at once.
A parent might have a financially successful child who owns a business and has potential liability exposure. Another child may have difficulty managing large sums of money. A grandchild may be too young to responsibly control an inheritance. Instead of treating these situations identically, a customized estate plan can establish different provisions for different beneficiaries.
This is one of the reasons we do not believe estate planning should be an assembly-line process. Two children receiving equal inheritances do not necessarily need identical trust provisions. The amount inherited may be the same while the legal framework protecting each inheritance is different.
A well-drafted plan can consider creditor exposure, financial maturity, family circumstances, tax objectives, and the long-term preservation of assets rather than focusing solely on who receives what at death.
Families with significant New York and Florida connections should also consider which state’s law may govern a trust and where the trust will ultimately be administered.
Florida Statutes § 736.0502 expressly recognizes valid spendthrift provisions that restrict both voluntary and involuntary transfers of a beneficiary’s interest. Subject to statutory exceptions, creditors generally cannot reach the protected trust interest or a distribution before the beneficiary receives it.
Florida law also distinguishes between protecting a beneficiary and protecting the person who created the trust. Under Florida Statutes § 736.0505, property in a revocable trust remains subject to the settlor’s creditors during the settlor’s lifetime to the extent it would otherwise have been available if owned directly.
For snowbirds, this means we should not assume that a trust prepared under one state’s law will produce every desired result after residency, property ownership, trustees, or family circumstances change. New York and Florida planning should work together rather than exist as two disconnected estate plans.
An inheritance can represent decades of a family’s work, savings, and investment growth. Once assets are distributed outright, many of the protections that could have been created through estate planning may be lost.
We therefore encourage clients to ask more than, “Who should inherit my assets?” Another important question is, “What should happen to those assets after my beneficiary inherits?”
A properly structured trust may allow an inheritance to remain available for a loved one’s benefit while providing meaningful protection from certain creditor risks. The appropriate structure depends on the beneficiary, the assets involved, the family’s objectives, and the laws that apply. Thoughtful planning before problems arise can make an enormous difference in how much family wealth survives for the next generation.
Potentially. If you leave money outright to your child and the assets become the child’s personal property, an existing judgment creditor may be able to pursue assets that are otherwise legally available to satisfy the judgment. Leaving an inheritance in a properly structured third-party trust can produce a different result. New York CPLR § 5205© provides protection for certain property held in trust for a judgment debtor when the trust was created by or funded by someone other than that debtor. The exact protection depends on the terms of the trust and the circumstances involved.
Generally, creating a revocable trust does not make your assets immune from your own creditors. Because you ordinarily retain substantial control over assets in your revocable trust, creditor protection is not the primary purpose of this type of planning. New York EPTL § 7-3.1 generally prevents a person from placing assets in trust for his or her own benefit and using that arrangement to defeat existing or future creditors. Revocable living trusts may serve many important estate planning purposes, but clients should not assume that creditor protection for the trust creator is one of them.
There is no single answer that works for every family. Lifetime trusts can provide significant advantages, particularly when substantial assets are involved or a beneficiary has potential exposure to lawsuits, business liabilities, financial instability, or other risks. However, the trust should still provide practical access to funds and reflect the beneficiary’s circumstances. We consider the size of the inheritance, the beneficiary’s financial maturity, trustee selection, tax considerations, and the client’s long-term goals before recommending a particular distribution structure.
Sometimes, but the amount of authority given to the beneficiary must be considered carefully. Giving a beneficiary unlimited rights to demand or distribute trust property can undermine protections that the trust was intended to provide. Depending on the objectives, an independent trustee, co-trustee, or carefully limited distribution standard may be appropriate. Trustee selection is therefore not merely an administrative decision. It can affect how the trust functions and how effectively its protections operate.
Florida recognizes spendthrift trusts under Florida Statutes § 736.0502. A valid spendthrift provision generally restricts both voluntary and involuntary transfers of a beneficiary’s interest, subject to statutory exceptions. This can be particularly relevant to New York snowbirds whose beneficiaries, trustees, property, or trust administration may eventually have Florida connections. We prefer to address these multistate questions when the estate plan is created rather than leaving beneficiaries to resolve them after a death or creditor problem occurs.
Leaving an inheritance is only one part of protecting your family’s financial future. How that inheritance is structured can determine whether family wealth remains protected and productive for years to come. At Bernard Law P.C., we help families create individualized estate plans that address trusts, creditor concerns, estate taxation, family circumstances, business interests, and New York and Florida snowbird planning.
Our office is located in Shoraham, New York, and we serve clients throughout Suffolk County. We believe estate planning should reflect your actual family and financial circumstances rather than forcing every client into the same standardized plan.
If you are considering leaving assets in trust for your children, grandchildren, or other beneficiaries, we can help you understand the legal options available and determine which structure is appropriate for your estate. Call our Suffolk County estate planning lawyer at Bernard Law P.C. at (631) 378-2500 to schedule a free consultation.
