Book your Free Estate Planning Consultation Today
Book an Initial Call Now
A trust can do much more than determine who receives property after someone dies. In the right circumstances, it can also control how an inheritance is managed, when distributions are made, and how much access a beneficiary has to the assets. One tool we may use for these purposes is a spendthrift trust. This type of planning can be particularly useful when a parent or grandparent wants to leave assets to someone without giving that beneficiary immediate and unrestricted control. It may also provide meaningful protection when a beneficiary faces creditor problems, poor financial judgment, divorce concerns, or other risks. The important point is that a spendthrift trust is not simply an asset protection label that can be added to any trust and expected to solve every problem.
At Bernard Law P.C., we look at why the protection is needed before deciding how a trust should be drafted. New York has specific rules governing a beneficiary’s ability to transfer trust interests and a creditor’s ability to reach trust property. Those rules become especially important when clients own substantial assets, have children with different financial circumstances, or divide their time between New York and Florida.
A spendthrift trust generally restricts a beneficiary from voluntarily transferring or assigning certain trust interests while also limiting the ability of creditors to reach property that remains inside the trust.
New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 7-1.5 contains important restrictions involving a beneficiary’s interest in an express trust. Among other things, the statute generally restricts a beneficiary’s ability to transfer a right to receive trust income unless the trust instrument gives the beneficiary that power. New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 5205(c) also provides significant creditor protection for property held in trust for a judgment debtor when the trust was created or funded by someone other than that debtor.
That distinction is important. Suppose parents establish a properly drafted trust for an adult child rather than leaving the inheritance directly to that child. If the assets remain in the trust and the beneficiary does not have unrestricted ownership, the trust may provide greater protection against certain judgment creditors than an outright inheritance would.
Once money is distributed to the beneficiary, however, the situation can change. Spendthrift protection is generally strongest while the property remains under the terms and control of the trust rather than sitting in the beneficiary’s personal account.
We may consider spendthrift planning when a beneficiary’s circumstances create a realistic concern about how an inheritance will be handled. For example, a parent may have one child who is financially responsible and another who has significant debts or difficulty managing money. Leaving both children an outright inheritance may technically be equal, but it may not produce equally good results. A trust can allow the second child’s inheritance to remain invested and managed by a trustee while distributions are made under carefully written standards.
A similar concern may arise when a beneficiary works in a profession with substantial litigation exposure, owns a business, has creditor issues, or is going through an unstable financial period. A client may also be worried about what could happen to inherited wealth if a child’s marriage later ends in divorce.
The goal is not necessarily to prevent a beneficiary from receiving anything. Instead, we may create a structure that permits distributions for the beneficiary’s needs while reducing the beneficiary’s direct control over the underlying assets.
That distinction often makes a spendthrift trust useful for long-term family wealth planning rather than merely for situations involving an irresponsible beneficiary.
A spendthrift trust should never be presented as absolute creditor protection. New York law recognizes circumstances in which creditors may still have rights involving trust income. For example, EPTL § 7-3.4 provides that excess income from certain trusts, beyond what is necessary for the beneficiary’s education and support, may be subject to creditor claims. CPLR § 5205 also contains exceptions and limitations to the general protection available for certain trust property and income.
Trust drafting also matters enormously. The amount of control given to the beneficiary, the trustee’s discretion, mandatory distribution requirements, and the identity of the person who funded the trust may all affect the level of protection available.
For that reason, we do not look at the words “spendthrift provision” in isolation. We examine the entire trust structure and determine how it is intended to operate in real life.
One of the most important limitations involves self-settled trusts. New York EPTL § 7-3.1 provides that a disposition in trust for the use of the person who created the trust is generally void against that person’s existing or subsequent creditors. In practical terms, someone usually cannot place personal assets into a trust, remain entitled to use those assets, and expect the trust automatically to prevent legitimate creditors from reaching them.
This is very different from a parent creating a trust for a child. In that situation, the beneficiary did not contribute the property and may have only limited rights to distributions.
This distinction is critical because clients sometimes hear the term “asset protection trust” and assume a trust can simply shield assets they still fully control. New York law does not work that way.
Planning must occur before problems arise, and it must be structured around legitimate estate planning goals rather than an attempt to defeat existing creditors.
The real question is not simply whether a spendthrift trust provides protection. The better question is whether that protection serves the family’s goals. Some beneficiaries may need substantial trustee oversight. Others may only need protection for a limited period before receiving assets outright. Still others may benefit from continuing lifetime trusts that provide access to funds without transferring complete ownership of the underlying inheritance.
We believe those decisions should be individualized. A trust designed for a 22-year-old beneficiary with limited financial experience should not necessarily look like a trust for a 55-year-old physician, business owner, or financially sophisticated adult child.
The value of spendthrift planning comes from matching the trust structure to the risks the family is actually trying to address.
A spendthrift provision generally restricts a beneficiary from assigning or transferring a protected trust interest and may prevent certain creditors from reaching trust assets before the trustee distributes them. New York law provides protections for qualifying third-party trusts, but those protections are subject to statutory limitations. A spendthrift provision should therefore be viewed as one component of a properly designed trust rather than as an absolute guarantee against every possible creditor.
Yes, depending on the circumstances. New York law provides meaningful protection for certain property held in a trust created by someone other than the beneficiary, but exceptions can apply. EPTL § 7-3.4, for example, permits creditor claims against certain excess trust income beyond the amount necessary for the beneficiary’s education and support. The specific trust language and the nature of the creditor’s claim matter.
Creating a trust for yourself generally does not provide the same creditor protection available when someone else creates a trust for your benefit. New York EPTL § 7-3.1 states that a trust disposition for the use of its creator is generally void against the creator’s existing or subsequent creditors. This is why third-party planning and self-settled planning must be distinguished carefully.
It may provide meaningful protection, but the result depends on how the trust is drafted, administered, and how distributions are handled. Keeping inherited assets in a discretionary trust may offer more separation than distributing the entire inheritance directly to the child. Once distributions are made and mixed with marital assets, the analysis may become more complicated. We generally consider the beneficiary’s marriage, financial habits, and anticipated access to trust property when designing the plan.
No. Financial irresponsibility is only one possible reason to use this type of planning. Spendthrift provisions may also be useful for financially successful beneficiaries who face professional liability, business risks, creditor exposure, or concerns about preserving family wealth across generations. A financially sophisticated beneficiary may still benefit from assets remaining inside a properly structured trust.
A spendthrift trust can be a valuable estate planning tool when you want to provide for someone while also protecting the inheritance from financial risks, poor decisions, or certain creditor claims. The effectiveness of the trust, however, depends heavily on who creates it, how it is drafted, who controls distributions, and the beneficiary’s individual circumstances.
At Bernard Law P.C., we help families create estate plans that reflect their actual assets, concerns, and family relationships rather than relying on a standard trust structure. We also assist New York and Florida snowbirds whose planning may involve property, beneficiaries, or legal considerations in both states.
If you are considering a spendthrift trust or want to determine whether additional protection should be included in your estate plan, Bernard Law P.C. can help you evaluate your options. Our law office is located in Shoreham, and we serve clients throughout Suffolk County.
Call our Suffolk County estate planning attorney at Bernard Law P.C. at (631) 378-2500 to schedule a free consultation and discuss how a carefully designed trust may help protect the inheritance you intend to leave to the people you care about.
